Naan kadavul part 1 In

Naan kadavul part 1

In BDRebuilder I m using outputBD25 with high quality default, but I see there is an high-speed encoding option for BD Is there a lot of quality difference between the 2 encoder settings? I m asking because it take so long to encode and compare, any opinion will be apreciated. The quality difference isn t HUGE by any means, but it is certainly different. I would recommend you encode the same movie using both settings and see if you can put up with the high speed output. The quality of an encode is entirely subjective to the viewer. Some viewers can handle more artifacts, others, less. Got back the movie Pinocchio re ripped with latest anydvd re encoded with BD rebuilder last version default settings, but got the same error: 07 Multiplexing M2TS Pes packet len too large 100Mb. Bad stream or invalid codec speciffed. 39 Failed to build structure, aborted Hmm and this only happens on some specific movies? In all honesty, I recommend that you get an account at Doom9 and post in this thread, as it is maintained by the program author and he can provide direct support that way. This is a program specific error and naan kadavul part 1 I can t look at the source code, I can t do much more. up to now now is the only title giving me hard time. I m reading also the thread you say just to stay tuned, somebody else had the same problem in 2009 with the same title cars. The problem seem to be in the naan kadavul part 1 tsmuxer, but none has a real solution. Onestly I don t care so much for this title. A friend of mine gave me the 5 Herry Potter and 3 Matrix, plus I want to test the quick encode option and compare with High quality. I have bd rebuilder 6 and it says beta version expired. Do I only have to download a newer version of it? Or do I need to uninstall all the other sub software programs Haali Media Splitter and reinstall them? Thanks! Yes, you only have to download a newer version of it. You do not need to uninstall any of the sub software. Q about the custom size setting. Is 23450 the largest, safest setting for a BD-25 disc? If not, how did they arrive at that number? I know there s overhead, but should we be able to set it to around 24GB without running out of space? This is kind of up to you. The overhead is based on a disk-by-disk basis, and 23450 has been proven to be safe. You can theoretically add some megabytes if you are so inclined, but you really do risk overshooting your final disk size, resulting in a pointless encode. In actuality, the increase of the final output size by a few megabytes will only increase quality by a tiny amount. A very tiny amount. Chances are very slim that you will be able to tell the difference. Because of this, I would rather not risk producing an oversized encode for an almost theoretical increase in quality. But, I leave the choice up to you. Adub, thanks for the response. When you say overhead is based on a disc-by-disc basis, are you referring to the blank media or the source disc? And in what way is the overhead dependent? I ve already used fit to BD-25 mode and have gotten a disc around 5GB. The custom default 23450 has also given me something around 21 GB. Now that s more than a few Megabytes wasted there when compared to the raw capacity of a SL BD disc. I have set the custom size at 24000 MB and seem to have no problem. My next question would be, if the rebuild goes over this amount is there any kind of warning given? Or is the output just higher than what is set in the custom size field? And if I use Burn to disc with Image Burn option and for some reason the amount of the output is greater than the disc will allow, do you get a stoppage and warning. I m asking because I do unattended backups. After i have update my BD-Rebuilde to v 04 i got this message, what programs versions shut i use insted 00:25:20 Reencoding: VID00007, Pass 1 of 1 Reached retry limit. Aborting. AVISYNTH Version: 0, not recommended version FFDSHOW: 3356, not recommended version Download links are included.